" Both men saw in a certain actor
and dramatist a suspected rival. Only one such successful practising
actor-playwright is known to us at this date (1592-1601),--and he is
Shakespeare. Unless another such existed, Greene, in 1592, alludes
to William Shak(&c.) as a player and playwright. This proves that
the actor from Stratford was accepted in Greene's world as an author
of plays in blank verse. He cannot, therefore, have seemed incapable
of his poetry.
Let us now briefly consider other contemporary allusions to
Shakespeare selected by Mr. Greenwood himself. No allusion can prove
that Shakespeare was the author of the work attributed to him in the
allusions. The plays and poems MAY have been by James VI and I, "a
parcel-poet." The allusions can prove no more than that, by his
contemporaries, Shakespeare was believed to be the poet, which is
impossible if he were a mere rustic ignoramus, as the Baconians aver.
Omitting some remarks by Chettle on Greene's Groatsworth of Wit,
{146a} as, if grammar goes for all, they do not refer to Shakespeare,
we have the Cambridge farce or comedy on contemporary literature, the
Return from Parnassus (1602?). The University wits laugh at
Shakespeare,--not an university man, as the favourite poet, in his
Venus and Adonis, of a silly braggart pretender to literature,
Gullio.
They also introduce Kempe, the low comedy man of Shakespeare's
company, speaking to Burbage, the chief tragic actor, of Shakespeare
as a member of their company, who, AS AN AUTHOR OF PLAYS, "puts down"
the University wits "and Ben Jonson too.
Pages:
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143