They lie as they were
left in the far-away Palaeolithic Age, and they have lain there till
taken away by the modern explorer.
But this is not the case with all the Palaeolithic flints of Thebes. In
the year 1882 Maj.-Gen. Pitt-Rivers discovered Palaeolithic flints in the
deposit of diluvial detritus which lies between the cultivation and the
mountains on the west bank of the Nile opposite Luxor. Many of these are
of the same type as those found on the surface of the mountain plateau
which lies at the head of the great _wadi_ of the Tombs of the Kings,
while the diluvial deposit is at its mouth. The stuff of which the
detritus is composed evidently came originally from the high plateau,
and was washed down, with the flints, in ancient times.
This is quite conceivable, but how is it that the flints left behind
on the plateau remain on the original ancient surface? How is it
conceivable that if (on the old theory) these plateaus were in
Palaeolithic days clothed with forest, the Palaeolithic flints could even
in a single instance remain undisturbed from Palaeolithic times to the
present day, when the forest in which they were made and the forest soil
on which they reposed have entirely disappeared? If there were woods and
forests On the heights, it would seem impossible that we should find,
as we do, Palaeolithic implements lying in situ on the desert surface,
around the actual manufactories where they were made.
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25